Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) and State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) grades B while State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D. Funding ratios: 72% vs 44%.

Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 28.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.1%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.

MetricArizona State Retirement System (ASRS)State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
68/100 (B)*42/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
72.3%*44.1%
Total Assets$46.0B$22.5B
Total Liabilities$63.6B$51.0B*
Unfunded Liability$17.6B*$28.5B
Participants588,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return5.8%*5.1%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatecritical
SponsorState of ArizonaState of Illinois

Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 28.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.1%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.

Explore More