AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.7 percentage points (81.8% vs 80.1%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 472,000 participants.
| Metric | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.8%* | 80.1% |
| Total Assets | $55.0B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $67.2B* | $83.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B* | $16.5B |
| Participants | 472,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.9% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | corporate | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | AT&T Inc. | General Motors |
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.7 percentage points (81.8% vs 80.1%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 472,000 participants.