AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 81.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.
| Metric | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan | Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.8% | 84.8%* |
| Total Assets | $55.0B | $35.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $67.2B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B | $6.4B* |
| Participants | 472,000 | 372,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.9%* | 6.4% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | AT&T Inc. | State of Iowa |
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 81.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.