AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.0 percentage points (83.8% vs 81.8%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.
| Metric | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.8% | 83.8%* |
| Total Assets | $55.0B | $47.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $67.2B | $56.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B | $9.1B* |
| Participants | 472,000 | 220,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.9%* | 6.3% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | AT&T Inc. | State of Missouri |
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.0 percentage points (83.8% vs 81.8%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.