Skip to main content
PensionRisk

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan and Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: AT&T Pension Benefit Plan grades A while Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) grades C. Funding ratios: 94% vs 63%.

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.6 percentage points (93.7% vs 63.1%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

MetricAT&T Pension Benefit PlanPennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*57/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
93.7%*63.1%
Total Assets$30.0B$36.2B
Total Liabilities$32.0B*$57.4B
Unfunded Liability$2.0B*$21.2B
Participants286,355245,000
1-Year Investment Return6.9%*5.4%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorAT&T Inc.State of Pennsylvania

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.6 percentage points (93.7% vs 63.1%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

Explore More