AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (92.1% vs 81.8%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.8% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $55.0B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $67.2B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 472,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.9%* | 6.8% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | AT&T Inc. | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (92.1% vs 81.8%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.