AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.4 percentage points (86.2% vs 81.8%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B) | 81/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.8% | 86.2%* |
| Total Assets | $55.0B | $39.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $67.2B | $45.8B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B | $6.3B* |
| Participants | 472,000 | 385,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.9%* | 6.6% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | AT&T Inc. | Texas Counties |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.4 percentage points (86.2% vs 81.8%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.