California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) (C) and New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 67% and 52% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 58/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 15.0 percentage points (67.3% vs 52.3%). California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) covers 2,050,000 participants.
| Metric | California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) | New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 58/100 (C)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 67.3%* | 52.3% |
| Total Assets | $473.0B | $34.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $703.0B | $65.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $230.0B | $31.0B* |
| Participants | 2,050,000 | 425,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of California | State of New Jersey |
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 58/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 15.0 percentage points (67.3% vs 52.3%). California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) covers 2,050,000 participants.