Skip to main content
PensionRisk

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) grades C while Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) grades A. Funding ratios: 67% vs 86%.

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.9 percentage points (86.2% vs 67.3%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.

MetricCalifornia Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS)Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
58/100 (C)81/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
67.3%86.2%*
Total Assets$473.0B$39.5B
Total Liabilities$703.0B$45.8B*
Unfunded Liability$230.0B$6.3B*
Participants2,050,000385,000
1-Year Investment Return5.8%6.6%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of CaliforniaTexas Counties

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.9 percentage points (86.2% vs 67.3%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.

Explore More