Skip to main content
PensionRisk

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) grades C while UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 67% vs 86%.

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.6 percentage points (85.9% vs 67.3%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricCalifornia Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS)UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
58/100 (C)93/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
67.3%85.9%*
Total Assets$473.0B$5.2B
Total Liabilities$703.0B$6.0B*
Unfunded Liability$230.0B$848.9M*
Participants2,050,000365,494
1-Year Investment Return5.8%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of CaliforniaUFCW International

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.6 percentage points (85.9% vs 67.3%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More