California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) at 73/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 32.2 percentage points (105.1% vs 72.9%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.
| Metric | California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) | Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 73/100 (B) | 100/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.9% | 105.1%* |
| Total Assets | $318.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $436.0B | $23.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $118.0B | $0* |
| Participants | 985,000 | 230,039 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.7% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of California | IUOE Local 324 |
Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) at 73/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 32.2 percentage points (105.1% vs 72.9%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.