Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 49.4 percentage points (94.1% vs 44.7%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 44/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 44.7% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $62.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $140.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $77.7B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 424,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 4.8%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | State of Illinois |
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 49.4 percentage points (94.1% vs 44.7%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.