Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 36.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 57.8%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 57.8% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $72.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $124.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $52.6B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 518,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 5.1%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | State of Pennsylvania |
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 36.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 57.8%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.