Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 64.1%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 56/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 64.1% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $21.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B | $32.8B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $11.8B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 430,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 5.5%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | United Association (UA) |
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 64.1%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.