Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 94.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundRaytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%106.1%*
Total Assets$55.6B$43.8B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$41.3B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$0*
Participants634,861288,395
1-Year Investment Return4.5%7.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployercorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesRTX Corporation

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 94.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

Explore More