Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.2 percentage points (94.1% vs 67.9%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 66/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 67.9% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $16.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B | $23.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $7.7B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 5.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | State of Ohio |
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.2 percentage points (94.1% vs 67.9%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.