Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 42.8 percentage points (64.8% vs 22.0%). Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 625,000 participants.
| Metric | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 61/100 (C)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.8%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $58.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.5B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.5B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 625,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Colorado | Teamsters Central States |
Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 42.8 percentage points (64.8% vs 22.0%). Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 625,000 participants.