Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 40.3 percentage points (105.1% vs 64.8%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.
| Metric | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 61/100 (C) | 100/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.8% | 105.1%* |
| Total Assets | $58.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.5B | $23.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.5B | $0* |
| Participants | 625,000 | 230,039 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5% | 5.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | low |
| Sponsor | State of Colorado | IUOE Local 324 |
Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 40.3 percentage points (105.1% vs 64.8%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.