Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs South Carolina Retirement System
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 9.7 percentage points (64.8% vs 55.1%). Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 625,000 participants.
| Metric | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | South Carolina Retirement System |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 61/100 (C)* | 52/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.8%* | 55.1% |
| Total Assets | $58.0B | $35.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.5B | $64.4B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.5B | $28.9B* |
| Participants | 625,000 | 575,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5%* | 5.2% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | high |
| Sponsor | State of Colorado | State of South Carolina |
Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 9.7 percentage points (64.8% vs 55.1%). Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) covers 625,000 participants.