Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) and Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) grades B while Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees grades A. Funding ratios: 70% vs 106%.

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 36.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 70.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

MetricEmployees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
66/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
70.1%106.1%*
Total Assets$31.5B$43.8B
Total Liabilities$44.9B$41.3B*
Unfunded Liability$13.4B$0*
Participants327,000288,395
1-Year Investment Return5.5%7.3%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasRTX Corporation

Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 36.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 70.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.

Explore More