Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Florida Retirement System (FRS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Florida Retirement System (FRS) and Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Florida Retirement System (FRS) grades B while Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 82% vs 94%.

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Florida Retirement System (FRS) at 76/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 11.9 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.2%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricFlorida Retirement System (FRS)Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
76/100 (B)97/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.2%94.1%*
Total Assets$190.0B$55.6B
Total Liabilities$231.1B$59.1B*
Unfunded Liability$41.1B$3.5B*
Participants1,065,000634,861
1-Year Investment Return6.5%*4.5%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of FloridaTeamsters Central States

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Florida Retirement System (FRS) at 76/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 11.9 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.2%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More