General Electric Pension Plan vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
General Electric Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 28.1 percentage points (76.2% vs 48.1%). General Electric Pension Plan covers 318,000 participants.
| Metric | General Electric Pension Plan | New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 51/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.2%* | 48.1% |
| Total Assets | $38.5B | $28.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $50.5B* | $59.3B |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.0B* | $30.8B |
| Participants | 318,000 | 268,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.8%* | 4.9% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) | State of New Jersey |
General Electric Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 28.1 percentage points (76.2% vs 48.1%). General Electric Pension Plan covers 318,000 participants.