General Electric Pension Plan vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
General Electric Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.0 percentage points (76.2% vs 74.2%). General Electric Pension Plan covers 318,000 participants.
| Metric | General Electric Pension Plan | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.2%* | 74.2% |
| Total Assets | $38.5B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $50.5B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.0B* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 318,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.8%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) | New York City |
General Electric Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.0 percentage points (76.2% vs 74.2%). General Electric Pension Plan covers 318,000 participants.