General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 80.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.
| Metric | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 78/100 (B) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.1% | 83.8%* |
| Total Assets | $66.5B | $47.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $83.0B | $56.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $16.5B | $9.1B* |
| Participants | 302,000 | 220,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 6.3% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | General Motors | State of Missouri |
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 80.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.