Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 59.2 percentage points (81.2% vs 22.0%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 438,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | Teamsters Central States |
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 59.2 percentage points (81.2% vs 22.0%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.