Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.1 percentage points (81.2% vs 80.1%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2%* | 80.1% |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B* | $83.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B* | $16.5B |
| Participants | 438,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | General Motors |
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.1 percentage points (81.2% vs 80.1%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.