Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.0 percentage points (81.2% vs 78.2%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2%* | 78.2% |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $37.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B | $47.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B | $10.3B* |
| Participants | 438,000 | 425,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 6.1%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of Indiana |
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.0 percentage points (81.2% vs 78.2%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.