Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) and State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) grades A while State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) grades D. Funding ratios: 81% vs 40%.

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) at 40/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 40.8 percentage points (81.2% vs 40.4%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.

MetricIllinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)*40/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
81.2%*40.4%
Total Assets$51.2B$19.8B
Total Liabilities$63.1B$49.0B*
Unfunded Liability$11.9B*$29.2B
Participants438,000152,000
1-Year Investment Return5.8%*4.5%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorState of IllinoisState of Illinois

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) at 40/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 40.8 percentage points (81.2% vs 40.4%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons