Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.3 percentage points (81.2% vs 83.5%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2% | 83.5%* |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B* | $98.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B* | $16.2B |
| Participants | 438,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | University of California |
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.3 percentage points (81.2% vs 83.5%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.