Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 44/100 (D) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 22.7 percentage points (44.7% vs 22.0%). Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 424,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 44/100 (D)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 44.7%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $62.8B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $140.5B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $77.7B | $33.7B* |
| Participants | 424,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | Teamsters Central States |
Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 44/100 (D) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 22.7 percentage points (44.7% vs 22.0%). Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 424,000 participants.