Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 35.4 percentage points (80.1% vs 44.7%). General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan covers 302,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 44/100 (D) | 78/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 44.7% | 80.1%* |
| Total Assets | $62.8B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $140.5B | $83.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $77.7B | $16.5B* |
| Participants | 424,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | low |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | General Motors |
General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 35.4 percentage points (80.1% vs 44.7%). General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan covers 302,000 participants.