Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 41.2 percentage points (85.9% vs 44.7%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 44/100 (D) | 93/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 44.7% | 85.9%* |
| Total Assets | $62.8B | $5.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $140.5B | $6.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $77.7B | $848.9M* |
| Participants | 424,000 | 365,494 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | low |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | UFCW International |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 41.2 percentage points (85.9% vs 44.7%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.