Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) (B) and New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 78% and 48% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 48.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.
| Metric | Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) | New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B)* | 51/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.2%* | 48.1% |
| Total Assets | $37.0B | $28.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $47.3B* | $59.3B |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.3B* | $30.8B |
| Participants | 425,000 | 268,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.1%* | 4.9% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of Indiana | State of New Jersey |
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 48.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.