Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) and Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) grades B while Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 78% vs 105%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.9 percentage points (105.1% vs 78.2%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricIndiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
70/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.2%105.1%*
Total Assets$37.0B$24.8B
Total Liabilities$47.3B$23.6B*
Unfunded Liability$10.3B$0*
Participants425,000230,039
1-Year Investment Return6.1%*5.7%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of IndianaIUOE Local 324

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.9 percentage points (105.1% vs 78.2%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More