Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) vs Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 15.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 63.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.
| Metric | Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) | Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B)* | 57/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.2%* | 63.1% |
| Total Assets | $37.0B | $36.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $47.3B* | $57.4B |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.3B* | $21.2B |
| Participants | 425,000 | 245,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.1%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of Indiana | State of Pennsylvania |
Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 15.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 63.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.