Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) and State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) grades B while State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D. Funding ratios: 78% vs 44%.

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 44.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.

MetricIndiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
70/100 (B)*42/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.2%*44.1%
Total Assets$37.0B$22.5B
Total Liabilities$47.3B*$51.0B
Unfunded Liability$10.3B*$28.5B
Participants425,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%*5.1%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatecritical
SponsorState of IndianaState of Illinois

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 44.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.

Explore More