Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs General Electric Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.6 percentage points (84.8% vs 76.2%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.
| Metric | Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) | General Electric Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 84.8%* | 76.2% |
| Total Assets | $35.5B | $38.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $41.9B* | $50.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.4B* | $12.0B |
| Participants | 372,000 | 318,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.4% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Iowa | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) |
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.6 percentage points (84.8% vs 76.2%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.