Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 83.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.
| Metric | Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 80/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 84.8%* | 83.8% |
| Total Assets | $35.5B | $47.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $41.9B* | $56.1B |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.4B* | $9.1B |
| Participants | 372,000 | 220,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.4%* | 6.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Iowa | State of Missouri |
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 83.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.