Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs UPS Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 77.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.
| Metric | Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) | UPS Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 71/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 84.8%* | 77.8% |
| Total Assets | $35.5B | $44.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $41.9B* | $56.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $6.4B* | $12.6B |
| Participants | 372,000 | 335,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.4% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Iowa | United Parcel Service |
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to UPS Retirement Plan at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 77.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.