Maryland State Retirement & Pension System vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 50.1 percentage points (72.1% vs 22.0%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.
| Metric | Maryland State Retirement & Pension System | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 67/100 (B)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.1%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $61.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $84.6B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.6B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 398,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Maryland | Teamsters Central States |
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 50.1 percentage points (72.1% vs 22.0%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.