Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Maryland State Retirement & Pension System vs Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Maryland State Retirement & Pension System (B) and Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 72% and 79% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.7 percentage points (78.8% vs 72.1%). Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan covers 84,564 participants.

MetricMaryland State Retirement & Pension SystemLockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
67/100 (B)70/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
72.1%78.8%*
Total Assets$61.0B$17.4B
Total Liabilities$84.6B$22.1B*
Unfunded Liability$23.6B$4.7B*
Participants398,00084,564
1-Year Investment Return5.8%7.1%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorState of MarylandLockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.7 percentage points (78.8% vs 72.1%). Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan covers 84,564 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons