Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) vs New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 8.1 percentage points (60.4% vs 52.3%). Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) covers 465,000 participants.
| Metric | Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) | New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 56/100 (C)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 60.4%* | 52.3% |
| Total Assets | $54.0B | $34.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.4B | $65.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $35.4B | $31.0B* |
| Participants | 465,000 | 425,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.3%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | high |
| Sponsor | State of Michigan | State of New Jersey |
Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 8.1 percentage points (60.4% vs 52.3%). Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) covers 465,000 participants.