Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) and Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) grades C while Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 60% vs 105%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 44.7 percentage points (105.1% vs 60.4%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricMichigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
60.4%105.1%*
Total Assets$54.0B$24.8B
Total Liabilities$89.4B$23.6B*
Unfunded Liability$35.4B$0*
Participants465,000230,039
1-Year Investment Return5.3%5.7%*
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of MichiganIUOE Local 324

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 44.7 percentage points (105.1% vs 60.4%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More