Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) grades B while FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 79% vs 101%.

FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.2 percentage points (101.3% vs 79.1%). FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan covers 223,371 participants.

MetricMinnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
71/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
79.1%101.3%*
Total Assets$35.0B$26.6B
Total Liabilities$44.2B$26.2B*
Unfunded Liability$9.2B$0*
Participants378,000223,371
1-Year Investment Return5.9%6.3%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of MinnesotaFedEx Corporation

FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.2 percentage points (101.3% vs 79.1%). FedEx Corporation Employees Pension Plan covers 223,371 participants.

Explore More