Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 79.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.
| Metric | Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 71/100 (B) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 79.1% | 83.8%* |
| Total Assets | $35.0B | $47.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $44.2B* | $56.1B |
| Unfunded Liability | $9.2B | $9.1B* |
| Participants | 378,000 | 220,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.9% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Minnesota | State of Missouri |
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 79.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.