Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) grades B while Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 79% vs 105%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.0 percentage points (105.1% vs 79.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricMinnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
71/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
79.1%105.1%*
Total Assets$35.0B$24.8B
Total Liabilities$44.2B$23.6B*
Unfunded Liability$9.2B$0*
Participants378,000230,039
1-Year Investment Return5.9%*5.7%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of MinnesotaIUOE Local 324

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 26.0 percentage points (105.1% vs 79.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More