Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 79.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.
| Metric | Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 71/100 (B) | 100/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 79.1% | 106.1%* |
| Total Assets | $35.0B | $43.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $44.2B | $41.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $9.2B | $0* |
| Participants | 378,000 | 288,395 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.9% | 7.3%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Minnesota | RTX Corporation |
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.0 percentage points (106.1% vs 79.1%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.