Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) vs School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) (A) and School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 84% and 68% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (83.8% vs 67.9%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.
| Metric | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) | School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 66/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 83.8%* | 67.9% |
| Total Assets | $47.0B | $16.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $56.1B | $23.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $9.1B | $7.7B* |
| Participants | 220,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.3%* | 5.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Missouri | State of Ohio |
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to School Employees Retirement System of Ohio (SERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (83.8% vs 67.9%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.