National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 52/100 (C) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 10.4 percentage points (55.1% vs 44.7%). National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) covers 595,000 participants.
| Metric | National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 52/100 (C)* | 44/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 55.1%* | 44.7% |
| Total Assets | $14.0B | $62.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $25.4B* | $140.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.4B* | $77.7B |
| Participants | 595,000 | 424,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.2%* | 4.8% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | critical |
| Sponsor | IBEW & NECA | State of Illinois |
National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 52/100 (C) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 10.4 percentage points (55.1% vs 44.7%). National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) covers 595,000 participants.