National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) vs State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 25.1 percentage points (80.2% vs 55.1%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.
| Metric | National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 52/100 (C) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 55.1% | 80.2%* |
| Total Assets | $14.0B | $90.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $25.4B* | $112.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.4B* | $22.2B |
| Participants | 595,000 | 507,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.2% | 6.0%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | low |
| Sponsor | IBEW & NECA | State of Ohio |
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 25.1 percentage points (80.2% vs 55.1%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.